Act 3, Scene 2: Federal Bureau of Investigation, Press Room

Enter FBI Director James B. Comey, Jr., stage left

Second Citizen:

Peace! let us hear what FBI Director Comey can say.

FBI Director Comey:

You gentle Americans,–

Citizens:

Peace, ho! let us hear him.

FBI Director Comey:

Friends, Americans, countrymen, lend me your ears;

I come to bury the US Constitution, not to praise it.

The evil that men do lives after them;

The good is oft interred with their bones;

So let it be with the US Constitution. The noble Hillary,

Hath told you the US Constitution was ambitious:

If it were so, it was a grievous fault,

And grievously hath the US Constitution for answer’d it.

Here, in the face of the US Constitution,

Hillary and the rest took leave and destroyed of thousands of State Department work e-mails that we will never know about or read–

For Hillary is an honourable woman;

So are they all, all honourable men and women–

Come I to speak in US Constitution’s funeral.

It was my friend, faithful and just to me:

But Hillary says it was ambitious;

And Hillary is an honourable woman.

In the face of the US Constitution,

While at the State Department helm,

Hillary hath brought many bundlers like Rajiv Fernando

home to Washington DC,

Whose donations did the Clinton Foundation’s coffers fill:

Did this in the US Constitution seem ambitious?

When that the poor have cried, the US Constitution hath wept:

Ambition should be made of sterner stuff:

Yet Hillary says the US Constitution was ambitious;

And Hillary is an honourable woman.

You all did see that at the House’s Benghazi and State E-mail hearings,

In the face of the US Constitution,

Where Hillary hath thrice by thrice by thrice perjured herself in sworn testimony,

Was this the US Constitution’s ambition?!

Yet Hillary says US Constitution was ambitious;

And, yet, sure, Hillary is an honourable woman.

I speak not to disprove what Hillary spoke,

But here I am to speak what I do know.

You all did love the US Constitution once, not without cause:

What cause withholds you then, to now mourn for it?

Nay, dearest Citizens, to yearn for it?

O judgment! thou art fled to brutish beasts,

And men have lost their reason. Bear with me;

My heart is in the coffin there with the US Constitution,

And I must pause till it come back to me.

Alas, if it can ever come back to me.

First Citizen:

Methinks there is much reason in his sayings.

Second Citizen:

If thou consider rightly of the matter,

The US Constitution, and the United States of America,

Has been put to a great wrong.

Almost nobody had heard of it because the mainstream press only reports on Trump and attacks Trump.  For the record it was, in fact, Putin who after launching submarine-based cruise missiles at the Syrian rebels said that those cruise missiles could be easily “equipped either with conventional or special nuclear warheads.” He went on to say, “I hope we will never need [nuclear weapons].”

The point is the press won’t really report an actual nuke-use threat of a world-leader who possesses the largest-stockpile of nukes and who is active in military operations against the Syrian rebels, but the press attacks Trump if he so much as breathes.  The more the mainstream-press and mainstream-Republicans hate Trump, the more I love him.

Enlighten me, how is “keeping a list of Syrian refugees” unconstitutional?  Doesn’t the government have to keep a record of the list of the countries of origin of “asylum” refugees granted entry into the US?

I have just written a non politically correct sentence: “Islamo-terrorists infiltrating Muslim refugees.”  Why is that so terrible?  Because Obama will call me a “Racist,” and “disqualify” me as a citizen.  I mean, after all, in the wake of Trump’s urging a temporary ban on Muslims entering the US while we “get a handle on the problem,” Obama’s mouth-piece announced that “What Donald Trump said yesterday disqualifies him from serving as president.”

If Obama can call to “disqualify” Trump for peacefully speaking his mind, soon, Obama will “disqualify” anybody for saying anything.

And Facebook’s Zuckerberg came out against Trump for the Muslim ban idea.  So, Facebook and Zuckerberg could have informed on Malik and averted the terrorist massacre, but instead Zuckerberg attacked Trump.   Zuckerberg and his terrorist-hiding Facebook have the San Bernardino victims’ blood on their hands.

Lord Beaverbrook is said to have once asked an elegant socialite if she would spend the night with him for a million dollars, to which she responded, “yes.”  He then asked her if she would do so for 10 dollars, and she fumed, “Of course not, what do you think I am?” – to which he returned, “Madame, we have already established what you are. Now we are haggling over the price.”

PM Netanyahu’s non-stop offerings to Abbas of the two-state solution is a bizarre takeoff on this story in reverse.  In this reverse-world, with Netanyahu the socialite and Abbas the questioner,  Netanyahu offers Abbas payment in the form of a “demilitarized Palestinian State” if Abbas would only agree to accept Israel. But Netanyahu’s groveling offers of a two-state solution not only don’t validate Israel’s bona fides as a legitimate state, they delegitimize Israel’s very existence.

First, Netanyahu is prevaricating to his voters  by not building in Judea and Samaria.  Netanyahu ran on a right-wing platform and has betrayed the mandate on which he was elected and the people who elected him.  He can come up with all the reasons he wants for that, repeatedly claiming  that Obama threatened him.  The facts prove he has instituted a virtually total freeze on Jewish building in Judea and Samaria.  What’s worse, the Palestinians know this and the Palestinians know Netanyahu is lying to his own people.

Next, Netanyahu has convinced himself and his followers that the only way for Israel to appear “legitimate” and “rational” to the world is to offer the two-state solution, and to beg the Palestinian Arabs for peace talks despite their incendiary blood-curdling incitement and murder rampages.

Netanyahu’s behavior could be compared to the sister of a victim of a mass murder inviting the mass-murderer for dinner. Netanyahu’s offer of “talks anywhere, anytime” is beneath suicidalism.  It shows pathetic desperation and rewards Abbas for his genocidal incitement and encouragement of  blood-dripping murder sprees.

Do Netanyahu’s offerings of a ‘West Bank’ Palestinian state make Israel appear more “legitimate” or “reasonable” to the world?  To Netanyahu, maybe.  To the rest of the world? No.  It makes Israel look like a cheap thief who was caught red-handed, and wants to start to negotiate on keeping some of his ill-gotten loot.

Netanyahu is like the socialite, agreeing to a million-dollar “demilitarized” PA State to which Abbas responds, “How about it for $10?”  Netanyahu responds, “Of course not, what kind of country to you think I am?” to which Abbas responds, we determined that when you first offered to give me the ‘West Bank’ in return for my calls to annihilate Israel.”

The entire world surmises that only a petty-thief who stole the land to begin with would offer half of his land as an opening offer for negotiations.  Netanyahu’s offer of  two-states only served to convince the world that the Palestinian narrative claiming that Israel “stole the land” must be true.

Imagine a Palestinian would-be terrorist listening to Netanyahu’s offer for “anywhere, anytime” talks while Abbas is inciting teenage Palestinian Arabs to murder any Jew of any age. Netanyahu’s weakness incites the Palestinian would-be stabber to action because he thinks to himself, if stabbings made Israel agree to two-state solution talks, then more stabbing of Jews will make Netanyahu even more desperate to give up territory.

The terrorist asks himself, why serve Netanyahu a teaspoon of terrorism, if you can serve him a tablespoon of terrorism.  And, still, throughout the horror of Palestinian Arab murders, Netanyahu keeps begging for peace talks and spouting about the two-state solution.

Netanyahu’s two-state solution gambits don’t make Israel look reasonable, they don’t make the world love us. Instead, they make Israel and the world’s Jews look desperate. And that is a far cry from what the Jewish State was supposed to be about.

The only question to ask about the situation in Syria is whether Putin is purposefully trying to strengthen ISIL, aka the “Islamic State,” or is doing so inadvertently. Various estimates peg 90% of Putin’s bombs as hitting non-ISIL Syrian rebels while only 10% are said to have hit ISIL forces. Putin has turned the phrase “don’t throw out the moderate Sunni baby with the ISIL bath water” into “let’s murder all the Sunni babies, so we don’t have to worry about the ISIL bath water.”

In fact, the Russian press has shifted from claiming hits on “ISIL” to “anti-Assad forces.” And, since Syria is 85% Sunni comprising about 18 million Sunnis and really all the Sunnis are against Assad, this means that Putin has turned his entire Syria military operation into one big Russian war-crime Sunni-genocide-murder-spree.

As a preface, Putin’s Syrian “narrative” is all wrong. Bush’s war on Iraq didn’t create ISIL, Iran’s and Assad’s funneling weapons and IEDs from 2003-2009 to the Sunni al Qaeda in western Iraq laid the genetic groundwork for the Sunni extremists. So, it’s Putin’s “partners” who created the very cancer that is now the Islamic State. Great partners you got there, Vladimir!

Firstly, the “moderate rebels” held most of the Syrian territory between what were the remnants of Assad’s Regime and ISIL-held areas. What Putin did was to bomb the moderate Sunni rebels, so ISIL can take over the non-ISIL Syrian rebel positions. Putin’s bombs have actually made ISIL stronger in the “name” of ostensibly attacking ISIL.

Yes, if Putin destroys all the moderate Sunnis he will eventually get to fight ISIL. But, if Putin continues to degrade the moderates and non-ISIL Islamists, he will have made ISIL the only anti-Assad game in Syria.

Next, Putin’s Russian Orthodox explicit involvement on behalf of the Shiite Iranians has proven everything that ISIL has used as their recruitment drivers. Putin has proven ISIL was right from the start, and that it’s a Shiite/Western conspiracy to enslave and convert the Sunnis into Shiites. Given Putin’s actions, it turns out ISIL is 100% right. It is turning out to be a Shiite/Russian conspiracy to eradicate the Sunnis. Some crazy Russian Orthodox Priest even declared Putin’s Syrian attacks as a “Holy War.” The Priest’s claim of a “Russian Orthodox Holy War” on the Sunnis should get the ISIL recruitment mills going full-tilt.

It gets worse. Putin has sparked a war of mutual genocide: the Sunnis will now genocidally eradicate the Shiite Alawites, and the Russian/Iranians will genocidally attempt to eradicate the Sunnis. With Putin’s entry, the al-Nursa front has declared a war of genocide on the Alawites to match Putin’s genocide on the Sunnis.

The problem for Putin is there are still 17 million Sunnis in Syria, while there are only 2 million Alawites. All Putin has to do is take one look at Assad’s troops to see they are all 50-55 years old, whereas the Sunnis don’t look a day over 25 years old. It will be a bloodbath.

Putin has accomplished the impossible: He’s gotten all the Syrian anti-Assad rebels to share a common cause and actually agree and make “peace” with each other. So, instead of the rebels squabbling with each other, they will soon form a much more cohesive fighting force with hardened battle experience. So, again, Putin is insuring the most radical elements will control a stronger, and greater threat to the region in the aftermath of Assad and Putin’s eventual defeat.

And finally, the Syrian rebels have already started to mutate and change battle tactics, and counterattack the Assad advanced ground forces. Assad’s front-line forces don’t have the manpower to hold any significant territory. So, while Assad’s front-line forces may make some tactical headway, his rear-guard checkpoints will get ambushed and decimated. Therefore, very soon, any Assad/Hezbollah advance will face a withering attack on its supply-lines and communication.

In sum, Putin may bomb Syria to pieces, and murder millions of Sunnis, but it will boomerang and blow-up in his face. Napoleon thought he was a genius too, until he dealt with the reality of a long-line of supply and a withering dogged Russian enemy in its own territory. Does Putin think the Syrian Sunnis fighting for Allah are any less determined than his Russian countrymen were fighting for the Tsar against Napoleon? Putin is going to get his answer soon.