The Sunni Arab world has finally congealed against the waxing Persian/Iranian menace. Iran has exploited its false Shiite Muslim veneer to enslave the entire Sunni and Shiite Arab world. In response to a blatant Iran coup, Saudi Arabia has commenced bombing Shiite Houthi strongholds throughout Yemen. Egypt has tasked 4 warships to regain control of the Yemeni side Mandab Straits.

But, what next?

A southward Saudi ground war against the Houthis where northwest Yemen is just one huge mountain range is, at best, a long war. The Saudis will have to fight up mountains 3,666 meters high. Five and half years ago, the Houthis started a border war against the Saudis, and the fighting was brutal. Even with Yemeni Army help, and Jordanian commandos, after several hard months of fighting over only a 500-meter high mountain, the Saudis lost 133 soldiers.

Here, with no Yemen Army help, the Saudis would need to scale 3000-meter mountains against the battle-hardened Iran-heavily-armed Houthis in their home turf. From the south, a Saudi-Egyptian injection of special forces into the southern Yemen cities without a clear supply-line, and where the Sunni traitor Saleh already has deployed his indigenous forces, is equally dangerous. The Saudi/Egyptian ground force entry into Aden could easily end in Gallipoli-like bloodbath for Egyptians.

I posit that the Yemeni’s Houthis military position in Yemen is now Iran’s strongest military link in its daisy-chain of Persian evil. On the other hand, Iran’s governor Assad in Syria is Iran’s weakest military link. Assad is also currently the greatest mass-murderer of Sunni women and children in the world. Hence, the Sunnis best course of action is to militarily harass and degrade the Houthis and Saleh by blocking Iran’s air and sea resupply of the Houthis, while liquidating Iran’s Assad on the ground.

Here are the reasons:

First, in total opposition to Obama’s “I-love-the-Shiite-Iran” US policy, no less a great US general than General Petreaus recently testified that the Shiite Iran is the greatest danger to the world, not the Sunni ISIS. Therefore, Shiite Iran is the greatest danger to the Sunni Arabs (and even the Shiite Arabs for that matter). The Sunni world must expose Obama’s anti-Sunni, pro-Shiite policy shift, and his love-affair with Iran, the world’s greatest state-sponsor of Islamic terror. The Saudi rallying cry should be “It isn’t not a Shia-Sunni war, it’s Persian-Arab war.”

And, in fact, in Iraq and Lebanon, Obama is repeating the same Yemeni empower-Shiites/bomb-Sunnis game-plan. In Yemen, Obama’s drones only spied on and attacked the Sunni terrorists, but fed intelligence to and protected the Iranian-backed Shiite Houthi terrorists, helping them take over Yemen.

In Iraq and Lebanon, as long as Obama’s drones are protecting the Iraqi Shiite militias that are massacring Iraqi Sunni civilians, for the Sunnis, it’s a lose-lose proposition. 1) The disaffected Iraqi and Syria Sunnis will migrate to ISIS, and get killed by American bombs. 2) And, whatever’s left of the Iraqi and Syrian Sunnis will be massacred and raped by Shiite militias and Iranian forces.

However, by Saudi Arabia eliminating Iran’s Syrian governor Assad, the Saudis will have eliminated the Arab core of the cancer itself. Only then can the greater Sunnis world focus on fighting ISIS directly, hopefully healing Syria back to some type of multi-religious normalcy, and ridding the Sunni world of the Islamic State.

Second, the key Obama-Iran secret agreement underlying Obama’s Iranian nuclear-armament talks is that Obama will protect Iran’s Assad at any and all costs.

However, in liquidating the Assad Regime, the Saudis will have killed three Shiite birds with one stone. One, the Shiite mass-murderer Assad will be eliminated. And two, the Obama-Iran nuclear talks will be weakened, and may even collapse, under the weight of Obama’s failure to protect Assad. Three, the Saudis will put Obama in the shade.

Third, Syria is 80% Sunni and 12% Shiite, while Yemen is 55% Sunni and 45% Shiite. And both Syria and Yemen have roughly the same size populations of about 24 million people for each country. By eliminating Assad, a greater number of Sunnis will be freed and in less time.

In Syria, there are less Shiites that one is going to have to fight. But in Yemen, the northwest part of Yemen the Saudis would directly invade, holds the majority of the Shiite population. So, instead of liberating Sunnis, the Saudis will have to fight and occupy Shiites in order to liberate the Sunnis in the south.

Fourth, with Idlib lost to the rebels, Assad is already on the bubble of losing Aleppo and many of critical Syrian cities. And, there is already an on-the-ground Rebel Sunni force structure. Instead of using fresh non-Syrian troops, one can flood the more moderate rebel forces with NATO and Warsaw-pact anti-tank weapons, Gustav recoilless guns, M40 106mm recoilless guns, tons and tons of 106mm rounds, and other medium-weight weapons that will rip through Assad’s and Iran’s already weakened and buckling forces.

The Syrian rebels don’t need manpower, just the right weapons. Also, nothing will send the Iranians into greater shock than a couple of well-placed Saudi air-strikes against Assad’s air bases that are launching helicopters armed with genocidal chlorine-laced barrel bombs. Literally and figuratively, the Sunnis will get more bang-for-their-buck by eradicating Assad first, and stop Iran’s Obama-sanctioned genocide against the Syrian Sunnis.

The Syrian Sunnis are enlisting with ISIS in no small part because they see no one else in the world is trying to stop the war criminal Assad and his war-criminal Iranian handlers from dropping genocidal barrel bombs on innocent Sunni civilians. If the established Sunni countries passively watch Assad committing genocide against hundreds of thousands of Syrian Sunnis, why shouldn’t the Syrian Sunnis flee to the Islamic State? If Saudi Arabia degraded Assad’s barrel-bomb air-bases, they would become the heroes of the Sunni world and give hope to the moderate Syrian Sunni forces.

Fifth, by downing Assad, the Saudis would also put Lebanon on the threshold of eliminating Hezbollah, and their Iranian puppeteers. The Saudis expending significant order of battles into Yemen does nothing to free Lebanon from the tyranny and evil grip of Iran’s Hezbollah. And, a Lebanon without Hezbollah Lebanon’s Shiites and Sunnis can truly unite to fight ISIS that is a scourge to both Shiite and Sunni. The Sunnis must stop the Iranian sectarian demolition of the Arab world before it hits Lebanon, or there will be virtually nothing left of the Arab world. Removing both Iranian Shiite Assad and Hezbollah, before it is too late, is the only way to stop the Arab sectarian earthquake before its lays waste to Lebanon.

Sixth, Damascus is the geographic heart and crossroad of the Arab world, and Yemen is the tail. If Assad is eliminated, Iranian dreams of a Shiite Imanate running from eastern-most-Iran to the Mediterranean Sea to Libya will be shattered in one fell swoop. Contrariwise, any possible Saudi “victory” in Yemen would be worthless if Iran’s Syrian Governor Assad still held sway in Syria and Hezbollah still dominated Lebanon.

Finally, one has to always prepare for a desperate Iranian counter-strike against Saudi Arabia eastern provinces. The Saudis can’t “win” a hard war in Yemen, only to weaken against an Iranian direct attack from the east. The Saudis must husband their order of battle to prepare for the worst. For, if the Egyptians and Saudis violently block Iran’s coming resupply of the Houthis, the worst will come. The Saudis should tactically thin-out its over-forwardly air-assets at Dhahran AFB. Any reliance on Obama, or an Obama-ordered US defense of Saudi Arabia, is a fool’s game.

In short, the Saudis must strike Assad, Iran’s weakest military link, while harassing and degrading the Yemeni Houthis’ by blocking and destroying Iranian air and sea resupply.

In what was perhaps the most despicable, low-point of the Obama-engineered political assassination attempt against Prime Minister Netanyahu, California Senator Diane Feinstein – on CNN‘s State of the Union – said, “He [Netanyahu] doesn’t speak for me on this, I think it’s a rather arrogant statement. I think the Jewish community is like any other community. There are different points of view. I think that arrogance does not befit, Israel, candidly.”

Senator Feinstein gets her mentality straight from the same 1930’s and 40’s mentality displayed by the American Jewish establishment during the Nazi Holocaust.  Led by Rabbi Stephen Wise, the vast majority of American Jews chose the keep-quiet, watch-the-Jews-burn, and protect their Democratic President Roosevelt at all costs.

Only the very few Jews of the Bergson Group stood up for truth, for saving European Jewry and defied the Democratic Roosevelt. Sen. Feinstein’s public animosity towards Netanyahu proves nothing has changed since the First Nazi Holocaust. Sen. Feinstein is another Rabbi Wise.

Wikipeida: “Gerhart Moritz Riegner (Berlin, September 12, 1911 – Geneva, December 3, 2001) was the secretary-general of the World Jewish Congress from 1965 to 1983.

“On August 8, 1942, he [Gerhard Riegner] sent the so-called Riegner Telegram through diplomatic channels to Stephen Samuel Wise, president of the World Jewish Congress. (However, Wise did not receive it until the end of the month). The source of the information was Eduard Schulte, the anti-Nazi owner of a prominent German company that employed high-level Nazi officials. The telegram was the first official communication about the planned Holocaust.”

“On August 8, 1942, he [Gerhard Riegner] sent the so-called Riegner Telegram through diplomatic channels to Stephen Samuel Wise, president of the World Jewish Congress. (However, Wise did not receive it until the end of the month).  The source of the information was Eduard Schulte, the anti-Nazi owner of a prominent German company that employed high-level Nazi officials. The telegram was the first official communication about the planned Holocaust.”

The Riegner telegram read in part: “Received alarming report stating that, in the Fuehrer’s Headquarters, a plan has been discussed, and is under consideration, according to which all Jews in countries occupied or controlled by Germany numbering 3½ to 4 millions should, after deportation and concentration in the East, be at one blow exterminated, in order to resolve, once and for all the Jewish question in Europe. Action is reported to be planned for the autumn. Ways of execution are still being discussed including the use of prussic acid. We transmit this information with all the necessary reservation, as exactitude cannot be confirmed by us. Our informant is reported to have close connexions with the highest German authorities, and his reports are generally reliable. Please inform and consult New York.”

On the 28 August 1942, the Riegner telegram found its way to the President of the World Jewish Congress, Rabbi Stephen Wise, who decided to not make it public, and instead kept it quiet.

When much later in the war Rabbi Wise finally asked his “friend” US president Roosevelt to intervene, and save the Jews, Roosevelt said: “The only way to stop the slaughter is to win the war. Tell your Jewish associates to keep quiet.”  And, Rabbi Wise “kept quiet.”  And 6 million Jews died.

I repeat, Sen. Feinstein is another Rabbi Wise.

For today’s American Jews, “never again” is, at best, a useless cliche.  At worst, the J-Street/Peace-Now inspired American Jews perversely use the “Never Again” motto as a bully-club in their support of the Palestinians, and their BDS-laced-hate of Israel.

Unfortunately, the Feinstein type of American Jew still greatly outnumbers the Bergson-stand-up-for-truth Jew.  The proof?  Count how many American Jewish organizations came out in support of Netanyahu’s congress speech.  Virtually none.  The vaunted Conference of Presidents of Major Jewish organizations was AWOL in any support of Netanyahu.

Sen. Feinstein, in her execution of Obama’s shoot-to-kill-Netanyahu order, proved her loyalty is not to the Constitution of United States, and to the values of liberty and freedom it represents.  She proved her loyalty to the democratic President Obama.  but Sen. Feinstein took an oath of office to the Constitution and laws of the United States, not to President Obama.  Feinstein’s hit-job on Netanyahu showed she didn’t want the true American marketplace of ideas to guide what’s best for American policy.  Instead, Sen. Feinstein wants the monopoly of Obama’s Iranian insanity to reign tyranny over the United States and the free world.

Imagine for a moment, if the 1940’s Republicans had invited the Nazi Holocaust exposer Gerhard Reigner to a joint session of Congress, and that Sen. Feinstein was then a US senator.  On Roosevelt’s and the State Department’s orders, the 1942-version of Sen. Feinstein would have tried to kill the messenger then, as she sought to kill Netanyahu now.

Because, make no mistake about it, Obama’s Iranian-nuclear-strategy is to politically kill the messenger of truth.  Netanyahu is only the messenger of the simple truth that a nuclear-empowered state-sponsor of terrorism will bring a new holocaust and and irreversible catastrophe to the world.

Obama knows his nuclear empowerment of Iran can’t stand the truth of the light of day.  So, his strategy is to keep it in darkness and violate the Constitution by avoiding a senate ratification of Obama’s Iranian deal.  Be sure, Sen. Feinstein will again violate her oath of office by supporting Obama’s Iranian-nuclear end run around the US Senate.

Little did Sen. Feinstein know that Feinstein’s Netanyahu “doesn’t represent her”, intended as an insult, was the highest compliment and endorsement of Netanyahu and his position. Thank G-d Netanyahu doesn’t represent Sen. Feinstein’s mentality.