As previously discussed, the Schiff Memo inadvertently and objectively opened the gates of an Obama governmental criminal conspiracy involving at least the Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates and FBI Director James Comey to have seemingly perjured themselves in their joint swearing that the sentence in footnote #8 on page 15-16 in the October 21, 2016 FISA application that “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person [Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s [Trump’s] campaign.” was true.  See Schiff Democrat Intelligence Minority Memo page 5.

By October 21, 2016, both surely knew Glenn Simpson aka “identified U.S. Person” was a paid Clinton Campaign/Democrat Committee agent.  So, to aver to the FISA court in writing that the FBI only “speculated” that it was only a “likely” that there was a political motive of Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS was objectively and grossly knowingly a doubly false statement to the FISA court.

The key is for the Trump defense to offensively use that sentence to destroy the entire Mueller investigation legally by asserting the October 21, FISA application was based on that perjurious sentence, and therefore the entire Mueller investigation is based on fruit of the poisonous tree of the perjured October 21, 2016 application.

Critically, one would argue that before a sitting president, President Trump, could or should be forced to testify, the defense should be able to depose Yates and Comey to expose what was an objectively cognizable conspiracy to knowingly lie in their FISA court application whose result could be to effect a coup d’etat.

The first question would be: Is such an offensive motion by the Trump defense team for a Yates/Comey deposition in, and of itself, an “obstruction of justice?”  The answer is that if legitimately attempting to zealously defend your client against a governmental conspiracy in seeking to depose the authors of a sworn written FISA document where the statement is objectively false is an “obstruction of justice,” then any legitimate act of President Trump’s legal defense by the President is, in and of itself, an “obstruction of justice.”  A person and his legal team legitimately defending himself can’t be considered “obstruction of justice,” otherwise every legitimate act in every  legal defense for every alleged defendant in the United States is obstruction of justice.

It is fair to say that all the “evidence” produced so far is based on evidence trickled out or illegally spun from from the original October 21, 2016 perjured FISA application.  So, if the footnoted sentence “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person [Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s [Trump’s] campaign.” was perjury, then the entire October 21, 2016 will surely be found to be legally defective.

If the authors of the October 21, 2016 are criminal perjurers, then all Mueller’s legal claims based on illegal fruit of the October 21, 2016 FISA application tree become legally unusable to show any legal basis for Trump being forced to testify in the first place. In fact, just the opposite will occur. It will show that Mueller has, in fact, been, at best, unwittingly conspiring with those who made that statement, Yates and Comey, to effectively advance what was an Obama governmental attempt at a criminal coup d’etat against President Trump.

Imagine for one moment, that two Trump administration ICE agents conspired to perjure themselves in a written application for a warrant to arrest an illegal alien.  The newspapers and cable shows would be screaming “perjury” “Nazi criminal ICE agents lie to the court for the new Hitler.” Or better yet, if two Republican-leaning Deputy Attorney General and FBI Director knowingly perjured themselves in a FISA warrant against a Democrat Presidential candidate?  The world would end as we know it. But, since Yates and Comey did so to destroy the Republican Trump, the media ignores the ugly reality staring them in the face.

Everyone should focus of the October 21, 2016 FISA application statement, “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person [Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s [Trump’s] campaign.”  The key perjury words are “speculates”, and “likely.”

“Speculate” is defined as to “Form a theory about a subject without firm evidence.” The FBI had firm evidence that Glenn Simpson and Fusion GPS were in Clinton’s pay. The use of “speculates” is a lie.  And, “likely” is defined as “probable.” It was also a lie when the FBI and DOJ claimed it was only “probable” that Glenn Simpson sought dirt on Trump when it was absolutely positive. There was nothing “probable” about GPS Fusion’s singular intention. So, one sentence, two lies.

Most important, the Trump team’s legally focusing on what was an objective fraud on the FISA court is a fundamental protection of the US Constitution itself, and of every American’s rights.  If the governmental can conspire to lie to destroy a candidate from one political party, then we have become a country of men, and not of laws. If the government can affect an unconstitutional criminal coup against a presidential candidate, then no American is safe from the government’s tyranny.  President Trump legal offensive against the perjured October 21, 2016 FISA application is the ultimate defense of the United States of America.

Democrat Congressman Adam Schiff, who has relentlessly led the House Democratic “Collusion” attack on President Trump, compiled a response memo attempting to contradict the House Majority Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) memo of the Department of Justice (DOJ), and FBI FISA court abuses committed against then-Candidate, and now President, Donald Trump.

Instead of contradicting the Republican Report, Schiff provided the public with the key documentary kernel of the actual text of the above-super-top secret Carter Page DOJ/FBI FISA application.  By providing this actual key FISA application text, Schiff has confirmed that numerous DOJ/FBI staff committed Federal crimes in their October 21, 2016 Page FISA application.

DOJ/FBI represented to the FISA Court that it only “speculated” that Glenn Simpson, whom the FBI/DOJ knew had been hired by the Clinton Campaign and the Democrat National Committee, was only “likely looking” for dirt on Candidate Trump.  It is the FBI/DOJ’s own words stating that Simpson was “likely looking” for political dirt that comprise knowing and intentional perjury by the DOJ/FBI to the FISA court.

The Clinton Campaign and the DNC weren’t “likely looking” for dirt, they were paying for any and every lie they could collect.  Such clear and convincing documentary evidence of DOJ/FBI’s grave Federal crimes under 18 U.S.C. Section 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court in a FISA application requires a Federal Prosecutor, not a powerless DOJ Inspector General.

Here is the actual unedited text of the Schiff Memo:

[Start of Minority FISA “Correcting the Record” Report page 5]

“DOJ’s Transparency about Christopher Steele

Far from “omitting” material facts about Steele, as the Majority claims, (footnote 17) DOJ repeatedly informed the Court about Steele’s background, credibility, and potential bias.  DOJ explained in detail Steele’s prior relationship with and compensation from the FBI; his credibility, reporting history, and source network; the fact of and reason for his termination as a source in late October 2016; and the likely political motivations of those who hired Steele.

DOJ was transparent with the Court about Steele’s sourcing:  The Committee Majority, which had earlier accused Obama Administration officials of improper “unmasking,” faults DOJ for not revealing the names of specific U.S. persons and entities in the FISA application and subsequent renewals.  In fact, DOJ appropriately upheld its longstanding practice of protecting U.S. citizen information by purposefully not “unmasking” U.S. persons and entity names, unless they themselves are the subject of a counterintelligence investigation.  DOJ instead used generic identifiers that provided the Court with more than enough information to understand the political context of Steele’s research.

In an extensive explanation to the Court, DOJ discloses that Steele, “was approached by an identified U.S. Person,(“Glenn Simpson”, Footnote 18), who indicated to Source #1[Steele](Footnote 19) that a U.S.-based law firm (“Perkins Coie,” Footnote 20) had hired the identified U.S. person to conduct research regarding Candidate #1’s ties to Russia.(“Donald Trump” Footnote 21)  (The identified U.S. Person and Source #1 have a long-standing business relationship.)  The identified U.S. Person hired Source #1 to conduct this research.  The identified U.S. Person never advised Source #1 as to the motivation behind the research into Candidate #1’s ties to Russia.  The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s campaign.” (Footnote 22- Entire preceding paragraph is from the actual Department of Justice, Foreign Intelligence Court Application, October 21, 2016, pp. 15-16, n. 8. Repeated in subsequent renewal applications.)”

[End of Minority Report]

Before discussing the “likely looking” smoking gun lie, a glimpse at some of Schiff’s legal analysis actually implicates Schiff himself in the criminal conspiracy to defraud the United States government.  Take his “unmasking” argument.  Schiff legally compares the unmasking of an incidental U.S. citizen who has been ensnared in a FISA surveillance with an actual all-too-willing U.S. citizen volunteer of “counterintelligence” information to the FBI.  To conflate the FISA civil rights protections of an incidentally surveilled US citizen with a domestic U.S. citizen and political organization who both knowingly and willingly paid for Kremlin-derived political dirt is, at best, a legal fraud.

There is absolutely no FISA application legal cause to unmask the incidentally taped US citizen who was not the counterintelligence target.  But, if a US citizen is actively paying Russian Kremlin sources for grossly political dirt, and knowingly and intentionally involving himself into a counterintelligence investigation, it is vital for the FISA court to know everything about him to assess the actual motivation behind creation of the proffered information, most especially his name.  Here, Schiff actually asserts, that the FBI/DOJ “purposefully” failed to unmasked Glenn Simpson, his firm, and most importantly his client – the Clinton Campaign.  This is such a purposeful material omission that it should be seen as a prima facie Federal crime.

For Schiff to claim the FBI/DOJ was protecting “sources and methods” by not disclosing the Clinton and DNC political source is ludicrous.  You protect the sources and methods of a “sleeper cell” in deep cover in the Kremlin because the sleeper agent will be captured by Russia.  Here the Clinton Campaign and DNC were in no danger of anything but well-deserved political embarrassment for intentionally providing the US government with lies and falsehoods.  Here, the Kremlin was explicitly and intentionally providing the political lies where the Kremlin powers-that-be were knowingly and purposefully feeding the DNC and Clinton campaign the anti-Trump lies.

And it gets worse for the Obama DOJ/FBI criminals.  The Schiff memo shows that the Steele “explanatory” paragraph was only in a “footnote” of the FISA application.  How do we know it was only referenced in a footnote in the FISA Top-secret application?  Because the Schiff “Footnote 22” states the cited paragraph was found at “pp.15-16, n. 8.”  “n. 8” means that the paragraph was in Footnote “8” at pages 15-16.  That  means the FBI/DOJ lie that no one could ever conclude was really the Clinton Campaign was hidden in a densely typed Footnote “8” making it highly unlikely anyone would even see it.

The heart of the matter is that on October 21, 2016, the date of the FISA Page application, the DOJ and FBI clearly knew Glenn Simpson was an immediate proxy and paid agent of the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.

Their FISA application footnoted and underlined statement that “The FBI speculates that the identified U.S. Person[Glenn Simpson] was likely looking for information that could be used to discredit Candidate #1’s [Trump’s]campaign.” is not only a sin  of omission, but an actual knowing and intentional perjury.  The FBI/DOJ knew that Simpson was a Clinton Campaign paid-agent who wasn’t “likely looking” for political dirt to discredit Candidate Trump, but  was single-mindedly, at any cost, 100% looking for any lie that they could find to discredit Candidate Trump.

The FBI/DOJ’s knowingly withholding this vital information about the real source of the financing of the Steele Memo from the FISA court, and lying about it in Footnote “8” implicate numerous Federal crimes that require an immediate appointment of a Federal prosecutor.

It is clear why the Republicans voted unanimously to release the Schiff “Rebuttal”: It contained the actual smoking gun text of the October 21, 2016 FISA application itself.  Schiff has unwittingly provided the public with the documentary evidence that proves the DOJ/FBI Obama lackeys committed federal crimes in their attempt to acquire the “insurance policy” that could destroy the Trump Administration.

If the October 21, 2016 FISA was a criminal endeavor, then we don’t have merely another Watergate, we have a massive ongoing criminal conspiracy against the United States of America.

AIPAC’s CEO has come out for the two-state solution, but more important, there are rumblings that the Trump Administration is close to unveiling its own Peace Plan.  From the snippets one hears in the media, chances are it will resemble the 1967 Allon Plan which incorporated the Jordan Valley into Israel and ceded Western Samaria, and Western Judea to some sort of Palestinian Arab State along with an extra-territorial corridor to the Gaza Strip.

While the Trump Administration has been the greatest American administration ever, such a plan is not only in the worst interests of Israel, it is first and foremost in the worst interests of the United States because Islamic terrorists will see any reward of the Palestinian Arab Terror Authority as an American sanction and legitimization of violent terror as a successful and legal tool.

For example, despite President Trump himself stating that the Palestinian Authority must stop paying terrorists and/or their terror families money for committing heinous violent terror acts, the Palestinians and Abbas himself have rejected such requests out of hand.  On May 23, 2017, President Trump said, “Peace can never take root in an environment where violence is tolerated, funded and even rewarded. We must be resolute in condemning such acts in a single unified voice.” Well, what has happened since?  The Palestinian Terror Authority has blithely continued terror payments for genocidal Palestinian murderers.

To add an exclamation point to the issue of terror payments, on August 23, 2017, it was reported that the chairman of the Palestinian Arab Terror Authority, Mahmoud Abbas, at a meeting with Jared Kushner and Jason Greenblatt, rejected American demands that he stop using foreign financial aid to pay stipends and salaries to the families of jailed Palestinian terrorists. In fact, the Arabic-language newspaper Al-Quds reported that Abbas’ response was to “inform Kushner that he would never stop paying these salaries until his dying day, even if this cost him the presidency.”

Now, the perverse genocidal reality of Palestinian Arab politics is that as long as Abbas continues the terror payments to his coterie of genocidal murderers, his leadership position is relatively safe.  The second Abbas even hints he will stop the terror payments, he might not live out the day, let alone continue as the Palestinian Arab leader.  By the Palestinian Arabs’ constant self-teaching of Israeli-Jew hatred, they have turned themselves into bastions of hate who live to murder Israelis.  Take for example the two female Israeli soldiers that took a wrong turn into a Palestinian Authority city and were almost lynched by the locals.

Or how about the Palestinian Arabs who voted more for Hamas than Fatah in the parliamentary elections? The Palestinian Arabs know both Hamas and Fatah want Israel’s annihilation and the genocide of the 6 million Jews of Israel.  The only difference is Hamas is explicitly for the Israeli genocide, while Fatah is tacitly for an Israeli genocide.  Nevertheless, the Palestinian Arab majority voted for Hamas’ explicit call for Israeli genocide.

This brings us back to the simple American demand that the Palestinian Arab Terror Authority stop making its terror payments since the American taxpayer is substantially footing the bill for those payments. It was reported by Haaretz on June 13, 2017 that US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson testified in the Senate “that the Palestinian Authority has changed its policy of paying families of convicted terrorists, and intends to stop supporting them as a result of pressure from the Trump administration.” It was further reported that, “in reply to a question from Senator Jim Risch (R-ID) on these payments, Tillerson said that the issue “was discussed directly with [Palestinian] President Abbas when he made his visit to Washington.”

Abbas was in the White House in early May, and according to Tillerson, President Trump talked to him about the controversial payments. “The president raised it, and I had a bilateral meeting with [Abbas] later and I told him – you absolutely have to stop this,” Tillerson said.  He [Tillerson] then went on to say that the Palestinians have in fact changed their policy: “They have changed that policy and their intent is to cease the payments to the families of those who have committed murder or violence against others. We have been very clear with them that this is simply not acceptable to us.”

But, we already know, 

As long as the Palestinian Arabs are brainwashing and paying their citizens to murder Israelis, how is the United States coming up with a “Peace Plan” to give the Palestinian Terror Authority anything?  How is the Palestinian Authority any different than ISIS?  Would President Trump give ISIS land in a “Peace Deal” while they are slitting peoples’ throats and paying the murderers?

In fact,

Such an American sanction and reward for Islamic terrorism will only incentivize other Islamic terrorists to murder American citizens all over the world.

Hence, instead of the Trump Administration rewarding the Palestinian Arabs for their institutionalized terror spree, there should be a complete cut-off of every penny America sends to the bloodthirsty Palestinian Arab Terror Authority.

For every penny America gives the Palestinian Authority is a sanction to Islamic terrorists all over the world that America sanctions and rewards Islamic terror murder.

Therefore,