In 732 A.C.E., the Umayyad Islamic Terror Caliphate in occupied Spain, or what was then al-Andulus, invaded the Duchy of Aquitane or what is now south-western France, and ransacked the French city Bordeaux.  Seeing the grave threat of the ravaging Islamic forces to Christianity and his Frankish Kingdom, Charles Martel marshaled his forces, and defeated the radical Islamic general Abdul Rahman Al Gahafiqi in the battle of Tours-Poitiers (a little east of Normandy).

In 732, in the face of massive Islamic victories, Martel’s Christian victory gave hope to the Christians and they renamed him Charles “The Hammer” Martel.

Martel’s victory steeled the arc of Christian Europeans, and enabled them to defeat the rampaging radical Islamic terrorists of that day.

Today in 2017, US President Donald J. Trump sees the same existential threat of radical Islamic terror to the United States and the Free World.  And, we must all support him, and pray for his absolute success: Failure is not an option.

Just as Charles Martel did in 732, President Trump sees the waxing Islamic terror, and calls it like he sees it.  In President Trump’s inauguration speech he stated, “We will reinforce old alliances and form new ones, and unite the civilized world against radical Islamic terrorism, which we will eradicate completely from the face of the earth.”  If you can’t name your enemy, you certainly can’t fight your enemy.  And, President Trump has named his enemy.

And in naming the Free world’s enemy, President Trump has named his allies, principally Israel.  In fact, one of the reasons President Obama would never name radical Islam as the enemy is because he knew that by naming Islam as an enemy he was naming Israel as an ally.  With President Trump, the world has gone from Obama’s Orwellian fake world, to Trump’s true world.

And just as Charles Martel had to fight a radical Islamic terror that had already occupied significant beachheads in Europe, so too must President Trump begin the fight where radical Islam has already intellectually and geographically occupied the European continent. These European “no-go” zones not only threaten the countries that have allowed them to form, but have eliminated the various countries’ ability to admit they are essentially “occupied.”  This harms their ability to effectively mobilize and destroy the waxing radical Islamic terror threat.

And just as Charles Martel had to completely reformulate his military, President Trump is rebuilding an American army that will be able to “eradicate” “radical Muslim extremism” off the “face of the earth.”  Such a military reorganization will require a complete re-think of our military force structure.  The threat is not a 20th century tank battle, but a 24/7, 365/365 day battle on all fronts: the Homeland, the Cyber-space, the Intellectual Battle Space.

And additionally, just as Charles Martel had to break up the Frankish establishment of Churches, President Trump is going to have to break up the American political elite establishment.  America’s establishment has been intellectually occupied by a politically correct mindset that has paralyzed its ability to effectively defend itself against “radical Islamic terror.”  As proof of their dystopic inverted worldview, instead of seeing President Trump as a modern-day Churchill defending the Free World against a neo-Nazi Fascist Radical Islamic terror wave, these crazies see Trump as a “Hitler.”  Instead of their writing articles for the Wall Street Journal and New York Times, these fake news writers and pundits should be shown up for what they are.

And finally, just as Charles Martel found the right topographically advantaged battlefield on which to take on the radical Islamic terrorist cavalry of 732, President Trump will find the right battlefield to eradicate the radical Islamic terrorists of 2017.  For while there are many fronts in which we face today’s radical Islamic terrorists, President Trump has hired the right man in General Mattis to lead those battles.  General Mattis will leverage America’s advantage and begin to turn back the terrible radical Islamic terror scourge that Obama encouraged and allowed to run rampant over the Free World in the last 8 years.

In sum, we all must pray every minute of every day for President Trump’s absolute and unalloyed success.  Hopefully, we will be able to crown President Trump, Donald “The Hammer” Trump.  Our every freedom and hope rides on his, and hence our, success.

At the outset of the American Civil War in 1861, the aging, wise, soon-to-be-retired-too-soon Union General-in-Chief Winfred Scott came in direct strategic conflict with George B. McClellan, the Union general who would recklessly and catastrophically lose the Union’s first phase of the US Civil War.

General McClellan believed in a direct attack into the south, and he failed. Scott believed in  a slow general blockade comprising a western smothering blockade slithering down the Mississippi, paired with an eastern naval blockade of the South’s ports.  Given the image of a slow-crushing of the South, Scott’s plan was, at first, ridiculed and derided, and came to be named after a slow, but deadly snake: the “Anaconda Plan.”  In time, Scott’s Anaconda Plan came to be the core blue-print for the North’s eventual Civil War victory over the South.

The plan’s use, however, is not limited to the good guys.

Today, for many of the same tactical reasons Scott advocated for his indirect, Anaconda blockading plan, Iran is successfully embarking on a modern-day Anaconda Plan for annihilating Saudi Arabia and capturing the Mesopotamian Black Gold Triangle that holds 54% of the world’s known oil reserves.  However, in today’s military parlance, Iran’s strategy has a fancier name, “A2/AD” which stands for “Anti-Access, Area-Denial.”

In fact, one can understand all of Iran’s seemingly disparate Arabian Peninsula/Levant Theater actions as really one-seamless Anaconda A2/AD attack plan with Saudi Arabia and the Sunni Gulf kingdoms as its one and only target. Iran plans to encircle and smother Saudi Arabia to death by insuring the United States will be incapable of defending the Sunni kingdoms when Iran strikes for their heart.

The strategic analogs between Scott’s Anaconda Plan and Iran A2/AD plan are striking. Share on X

In the West, General Scott envisioned going south down the Mississippi River to “cut the Confederacy in two.”  Today, in the north-east, Iran is going north upstream on the Tigris and Euphrates Rivers with the goal of reaching the Mediterranean through Iraq and Syria and Lebanon and cutting the Sunni Turkey/Levant battle-space in two.

We were warned by Mitt Romney in the last election campaign. Everyone laughed and claimed that the candidate’s 2012 Obama/Romney-debate truism that “Syria is Iran’s only ally in the Arab world. It’s their route to the sea.” was a gaffe.  The “genius” Washington Post and Guardian “fact-checkers” were too myopic to understand that Romney meant the “Mediterranean Sea” not the Arabian Sea.

What this Iranian Shiite land-bridge Crescent from Iran to the Mediterranean Sea really does is not just create an Iranian “route to the Sea,” it creates a strategic topological disconnection between the NATO bases of Turkey and the scenes of Iran’s ultimate point of attack: the Persian Gulf Sunni Kingdoms.  The Iranian Crescent cuts the NATO/Mesopotamian battle-space in two.  With this critical swatch of land spanning west and east in Iran’s operational control, in the event of an Iranian attack on the Saudis, Iran can erect an east-west anti-air missile cordon that will present any mustering Turkey-based NATO force with a perilous path to save the Sunni Kingdoms from a blitzkrieg Iranian attack.

Unlike Saddam Hussein at Kuwait, or Hitler at Dunkirk, the Iranians won’t stop and wait at Kuwait for the Sunni’s allies to re-group. Instead, the Iranians will run the Western Persian Gulf coast all the way to Oman sealing the Sunnis fate in one sweep. With an Iranian air-defense curtain across the Shiite Crescent to the Med, any Turkey-based NATO saving-force will arrive too late, and suffer catastrophic losses in order to stop the Iranian juggernaut from running the Persian Gulf table.

Back to Scott: Along the Confederacies’ eastern coast General Scott planned a naval blockade of the South’s ports. This naval blockade starved the Rebels of urgently needed ammunition and trade from Europe because the south didn’t possess real industrial might. Today, to the south-west of the Arabian Peninsula, Iran is sinking its teeth into Yemen, and through the thinly veiled proxy of the Houthis, it is creating an ultimate strategic naval choke point at the Straits of Bab El-Mandab.

In the event of an Iranian attack, the range of Iran’s anti-ship missiles is so long that Iran can be deeply embed hundreds of hardened Iranian anti-ship missile batteries far from the Yemeni coastline. An American saving force may be able to ultimately break-through. But, by the time such an American force broke through, it would still have to fight its way through the Straits of Hormuz. Thus, the Iranian game would be over in the Persian Gulf before the Americans would ever get through the Straits of Bab El-Mandab, let alone the Straits of Hormuz.

In sum, the Iranian military is successfully effecting a modern day Anaconda-style A2/AD strategy which mixes the topological aspects of the Japanese game of Go, along with the balance of chess aimed at total victory over Saudi Arabia and the West.

In the meantime, the current American Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson is pompously declaring that the A2/AD strategy is “dead.” Instead of planning how to defeat Iran, under the idiotic “leadership” of Obama, the American military is busying itself with “protocols” for the Pentagon to pay for sex change operations for American service-persons. (And, I kid you not, about this.)

Whoever gains the White House will face a waxing Iranian tidal-wave funded with $150 billion US dollars that will soon wipe the Sunnis off the face of the earth. And only too late, the world will realize the Obama Administration’s only “legacy” will be the creation of an Iranian Islamic Terrorist Nuclear-armed superpower empire with 60% of the world’s oil supply.

Obama's real legacy is going to be the catastrophic result of his ignoring Iran's Anti Access Area Denial (A2/AD) plan. A wake up call. Share on X

What is President Obama going to say now? Let me take a wild guess:

“It’s the truck’s fault. We must ban all trucks. No, it’s not Islam’s fault. It’s not Islamic extremism’s fault. To say that this monster was an ‘Islamic Terrorist’ would be saying we are war with all of Islam. We are better than that. We need to bring in more Muslim refugees.”

Obama isn’t the Commander-in-Chief, he’s the Islamic-Terrorist-Apologist-in-Chief. In a little less than 8 years, Obama has carefully overseen and carefully tended a massive incubation of Islamic terrorism’s base, from which the world may never recover.

First, Obama’s Iraq retreat and crowning Iran as hegemon of Iraq served as the perfect Petri dish for ISIS. Fearful to harm his Iranian Nuclear Bomb “deal,” Obama allowed Assad and Iran and Russia to commit genocide against the Sunni Muslims of Iraq and Syria. Obama not only gave Iraq to Iran, Obama is now ordering the US Air

Force to act as Iran’s de jure air force in Iraq. Obama has planted the seeds of thousands of Islamic terrorists beyond any stretch of the imagination.

Second, with his Iran Nuke deal, Obama funded the world’s leading terror state, Iran, with 150 billion dollars of blood money with which the terror state of Iran will further polarize and terrorize the Sunnis and everyone from the Persian Gulf west to Morocco, and south throughout Africa. And, an American general just reported there is now a recent massive influx of Islamic terrorism throughout South America. He didn’t mention “Hezbollah” by name, but it’s clear through other reports that Hezbollah is the major force of Narco-crime-trafficking through South America. Where did Hezbollah get the money to expand into South America?? Viia Obama’s funding Iran with 150 Billions of dollars.

Third, what’s the ideological difference between the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the Islamic State of the Levant? There is none. They are both neo-fascist terror organizations that want to annihilate Western Civilization, and replace it with their Islamo-Nazi Fascism that uses religion as a veneer to give it its politically-correct First Amendment protection. The Islamic Republic of Iran is merely the Islamic State with a nuclear bomb and intercontinental ballistic missiles to deliver them.

But Obama has made his Iran nuclear bomb deal his “signature foreign policy achievement.” We now know what happened to Obamacare, Obama’s other “signature domestic achievement.” Virtually all the insurance companies who first lined up to provide Obamacare now have abandoned it as economically unfeasible.

When Obama’s Iranian Nuke deal achievement fails, we won’t have wasted hundreds of billions of dollars. We will have hundreds of millions of dead people from Iran’s nukes.

According to the way Obama and Hillary Clinton view the world, it’s not Iran’s terrorism and massacres that are the problem. It’s not Islam’s 7th century barbarism which today’s Islamic terrorists are channeling. It’s trucks. We must stop truck proliferation. Then, when there are no trucks, the Islamic terrorists will murder people with knives. I wonder if we are going to ban knives.