The House Intelligence Committee’s “Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act Abuses (FISA)” outlines explicit prima facie criminal behavior that starts with former FBI Director James Comey, and seems to end with President Obama.  It may be the greatest subversion of the US Constitution ever, one that will expose the United States to necessary additional independent prosecution to unravel and uncover a far-reaching Obama Administration criminal enterprise.

To be specific, for starters, FBI Director and AG Loretta Lynch, and President Obama may even have engaged in a conspiracy connected to “18 U.S.C. Section 1001 Statements or entries generally,” and “18 U.S.C. Section 1623 – False declarations before grand jury or court.”  Both of these federal criminal statutes are felonies.

Let’s break down the factual components we know about as of today:

1. The FISA Statute 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1804 and the House Intel Memo seem to directly implicate Comey, AG Lynch and President Obama

To understand the likely criminality of James Comey, Attorney General Loretta Lynch and President Obama, one has to start with the FISA statute under FBI Director applied to the FISA court for the right to eavesdrop on Carter Page.

Under 50 USC Section 1804, the statute states:

“(a)Submission by Federal officer; approval of Attorney General; contents

Each application for an order approving electronic surveillance under this subchapter shall be made by a Federal officer in writing upon oath or affirmation to a judge having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title. Each application shall require the approval of the Attorney General based upon his finding that it satisfies the criteria and requirements of such application as set forth in this subchapter. It shall include—

(1) the identity of the Federal officer making the application;

(2) the identity, if known, or a description of the specific target of the electronic surveillance;

(3) a statement of the facts and circumstances relied upon by the applicant to justify his belief that—

(A) the target of the electronic surveillance is a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power; and

(B) each of the facilities or places at which the electronic surveillance is directed is being used, or is about to be used, by a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power;

The House Intel Memo states:

“On October 21, 2016, DOJ and FBI sought and received a FISA probable cause order (up; under Title VII) authorizing electronic surveillance on Carter Page from the FISC. Page is a US citizen who served as a volunteer advisor to the Trump presidential campaign. Consistent with requirements under FISA, the application had to be first certified by the Director or Deputy Director of the FBI. It then required the approval of the Attorney General, Deputy Attorney General (DAG), or the Senate confirmed Assistant Attorney General for the National Security Division. The FBI and DOJ obtained one initial FISA warrant targeting Carter Page and three FISA renewals from the FISC. As required by statute (50 U.S.C. 1805 (d)(1)) a FISA order on an American citizen must be renewed by the FISC every 90 days and each renewal requires a separate finding of probable cause. Then-Director James Comey signed three FISA applications. in question on behalf of the FBI, and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe signed one. Sally Yates, then-Acting DAG Dana Boente, and DAG Rod Rosenstein each signed one or more FISA applications on behalf of DOJ.”

Thus, from this statute and the very beginning of the House Intel FISA Memo, we can take away 3 important derivative facts concerning the Comey application to the FISA court in October 2016:

i.) The Comey October 2016 FISA application was made “in writing under oath or affirmation” that the specific and overall FISA application was true and correct;

Loretta Lynch, the then-United States “Attorney General,” most assuredly had to approve of Comey’s FISA application, and/or intimately know of its existence and substance because the FISA statute states that “Each application shall require the approval of the Attorney General” who was Loretta Lynch at the time.

If AG Loretta Lynch knew and/or “approved” a FISA warrant to investigate a member of a Presidential campaign for possible Russian infiltration, it is inconceivable that she didn’t immediately and fully inform President Obama of the outstanding application for the FISA warrant, and the “factual basis” for the FISA warrant.

2) Comey seems to  have omitted to Inform the FISA Court of the Material Fact that the Steele Dossier was a Clinton Campaign Paid-For Document

The House FISA Memo states:

“1) The “dossier” compiled by Christopher Steele (Steele dossier) on behalf of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and the Hillary Clinton campaign formed an essential part of the Carter Page FISA application. Steele was a longtime FBI source who was paid over $160,000 by the DNC and Clinton campaign, via the law firm Perkins Coie and research firm Fusion GPS, to obtain derogatory information on Donald Trump’s ties to Russia.

a) Neither the initial application in October 2016, nor any of the renewals, disclose or reference the role of the DNC, Clinton campaign, or any party/campaign in funding Steele’s efforts, even though the political origins of the Steele dossier were then known to senior DOJ and FBI officials.

b) The initial FISA application notes Steele was working for a named U.S. person, but does not name Fusion GPS and principal Glenn Simpson, who was paid by a U.S. law firm (Perkins Coie) representing the DNC (even though it was known by DOJ at the time that political actors were involved with the Steele dossier). The application does not mention Steele was ultimately working on behalf of—and paid by—the DNC and Clinton campaign, or that the FBI had separately authorized payment to Steele for the same information.”

There is no question that the Clinton Campaign provenance of the Steele “dossier” was a critically material fact that Comey should have and needed to have included in his recitation of the facts made under oath to the FISA court.  Comey’s omission of such a material fact is a criminal violation of 18 U.S.C. sec. 1001, and 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623.

3) 18 USC sec. 1001 makes “concealing, or covering up” a “material fact” a federal crime

In specific, 18 U.S.C. sec. 1001 states:

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years . . ..”

Now, there are so many ways that Comey’s use of the Steele “dossier” may have violated this section it’s actually sad.  However, for this article, the key point is Comey’s omission and failure to inform the FISA court that the Clinton Campaign paid for the Steele dossier, clearly“concealed”or “covered up” a “material fact.” So, there is clear prima facie evidence of a possible criminal offense for Comey under Section 1001 requiring an independent prosecutor to fully probe his, and the entire Obama’s administration’s actions including President Obama.

On the question of intentional criminal “omission” of a “material fact” as violating 18 U.S.C. 1001, an excellent, Congressional Research Service article by Charles  Doyle, outlines the requirement the “existence of a legal duty not to conceal” the “material fact” must exist for criminal “omission” to attach.

The Doyle CRS article states:

“Prosecutions under subsection 1001(a)(1) for concealment, rather than false statement or false documentation, must also prove the existence of duty or legal obligation not to conceal. Footnote 86.

Footnote 86: United States v. Safavian, 528 F.3d 957, 964 (D.C. Cir. 2008)(“As Safavian argues and as the government agrees, there must be a legal duty in order for there to be a concealment offense in violation of §1001(a)(1)”); United States v. Stewart, 433 F.3d 273, 318-19 (2d Cir. 2006)(“Defendant’s legal duty [as a broker] to be truthful under Section 1001 included a duty to disclose the information regarding the circumstances of Stewart’s December 27th trade…. Trial testimony indicated that the SEC had specifically inquired about [his] knowledge of Stewart’s trades. As a result, it was plausible for the jury to conclude that the SEC’s questioning and triggered [his] duty to disclose and that ample evidence existed that his concealment was material to the investigation ”); United States v. Moore, 446 F.3d 671, 678- 79 (7th Cir. 2006)(regulatory obligation); United States v. Gibson, 409 F.3d 325, 333 (6th Cir. 2005) (“Conviction on a 18 U.S.C. 1001 concealment charge requires a showing that the ‘defendant had a legal duty to disclose the facts at the time he was alleged to have concealed them’”), quoting, United States v. Curran, 20 F.3d 560, 566 (3d Cir. 1994).”

4) Comey and the Obama Co. may have also violated “50 U.S.C. sec. 1623- False declarations before grand jury of court”

In specific, 50 U.S.C. Sec. 1623 states:

“(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.”

Again, the Comey October 2016 FISA application was made under “oath” by Comey.  Comey’s intentional and purposeful omission of the “material fact” that the core basis of his FISA application, the Steele “dossier” was a Clinton campaign paid-for document clearly makes Comey’s entire FISA declaration a “false material declaration.”  Additionally, Comey made use of the Steele “dossier” itself which clearly contained many “false declarations.”

Section 1623 is even more important in that it shows Comey needed to include the material fact of the Clinton Campaign origin of the Steele “dossier” in order for the FISA court to assess the reliability of the “dossier.”  And, consequently, purposeful failure to include the Clinton origin by Comey was a prima facie violation of 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1623.

5) US Attorney’s Criminal Manual requires “vigorous prosecution”

One need look no further than the US Attorneys “Criminal Resource Manual” for its reference to “1741. Perjury and False Declarations Before Grand Jury of Court” that states: “Because false declarations affect the integrity of the factfinding process, the Attorney General’s Council on White Collar Crime recommends that offenders be vigorously prosecuted. “Perjured testimony is an obvious and flagrant affront to the basic concepts of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 576 (1976). See also, United States v. Wong, 431 U.S. 174, 180 (1977) (“lying is not a way to challenge the Government’s right to ask questions”).”

If the United States is remain a nation of laws, Comey and the Obama Company need to be investigated for possible actions against the laws of the United States of America in order to challenge the election of a President of the United States.

As I have written before in How to get 1 million more terrorists into the Palestinian Authority, a “West Bank” Palestinian Arab state would enable any Palestinian government to import not only all the 5 Million+ UNWRA Palestinian Arab “refugees”, but millions of Islamic terrorists of all stripes.

Gabbay’s messianic two-state “cure” would mean national-suicide, much worse than the problems of having to keep order among the “West Bank” Arabs, 95% of whom live under self-rule..

Saar’s statement, in plain politically-incorrect English, said: A “West Bank” Palestinian Arab State will be out to annihilate the State of Israel and, if the 6 million Jews don’t leave, there will be an attempt to enact another Holocaust.

I ask every reader to ponder this simple hypothetical: Imagine if you were a Jew in Europe in the 1930’s and 1940’s.  And, on the one hand, your leftist “leaders” are telling you that “Hitler isn’t all that bad,” and “Hitler doesn’t mean everything he says,” and you have to quietly march off to Auschwitz borders, or “there will be problems” for the shtetl.  At the same time, your “rightist” leaders show you explicit proof that Auschwitz is a extermination camp for murdering Jews  (modern transformation:. Katyusha rockets from a Palestinian Arab state will blanket pre-1967 Israel like the Gaza rockets now blanket the Gaza Belt, and Abbas will bring in another 5 million Arabs with hundreds of thousands of additional terrorists).  What would you do?  Would you believe cowering leftist politicians, or the truth of your own eyes and your own logic?

Over 500,000 people have watched my 9-minute video that explains how the Arabs will fire rockets into Tel Aviv from the ‘West Bank.’

Please share this video to your friends and family.

Edmund Burke once said, “The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”  Well, everyone, it is time to start doing something, or we could face an evil “West Bank” Palestinian state with another 5 million refugees and thousands of Katyusha rockets aimed at Tel Aviv and Netanya.  We can not allow delusional Israeli politicians like Avi Gabbay, financed by leftist American Jews, the opportunity to railroad the Jewish people into another genocide.

While the empty echo-chamber of Washington DC rattles and prattles on about President Trump’s “fitness” to be President of the United States, President Trump single-handedly successfully completed the greatest human intelligence coup in the history of intelligence spy-craft.  Without a budget, without sleeper spies, without secret drops, and using only his thumbs, President Trump unmasked the true state of North Korea’s nuclear and missile technology.

Normally, spy-masters have to use a “honey-trap” to ensnare an intelligence asset in order to blackmail him into giving up his government’s secrets.  Another spy-craft called the “money-trap” uses money to entice the asset only to blackmail him once he’s taken the money.  Uniquely, President Trump successfully executed the first “tweet-trap” in the history of intelligence.

…if the US Intel community was 100% wrong on North Korea, then the same intel community was 10000% wrong on the state of Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities

By merely tweeting, President Trump smoked out the North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Un and psychologically forced him to expose the true state of North Korea’s nuclear and missile technology.  In essence, while the deep state chattered, President Trump’s PsyOp single-handedly exposed North Korea’s deepest military secrets, so the United States now knows and can take action against the true state of North Korea’s (and hence even Iran’s) nuclear capabilities.

The New York Times on Sunday January 7, 2018, gave us a “snap-shot” of the state of the Unites States’ “Intelligence Community’s” intelligence assessment of North Korea’s nuclear and missile capabilities as of January 2017.  This is what the New York Times stated, “At the start of Donald Trump’s presidency, American intelligence agencies told the new administration that while North Korea had built the bomb, there was still ample time — upward of four years — to slow or stop its development of a missile capable of hitting an American city with a nuclear warhead.”

The North’s young leader, Kim Jong-un, faced a range of troubles, they assured the new administration, giving Mr. Trump time to explore negotiations or pursue countermeasures. One official who participated in the early policy reviews said estimates suggested Mr. Kim would be unable to strike the continental United States until 2020, perhaps even 2022.

Mr. Kim tested eight intermediate-range missiles in 2016, but seven blew up on the pad or shattered in flight — which some officials attributed partly to an American sabotage program accelerated by President Barack Obama. And while the North had carried out five underground atomic tests, the intelligence community estimated that it remained years away from developing a more powerful type of weapon known as a hydrogen bomb.”

There you have it.  At the start of President Trump presidency in January 2017, and after 8 years of then-President Obama, the vaunted US intelligence assessment was 100% wrong on perhaps the most urgent military/national security issue ever facing the United States. This US intel assessment was even more catastrophically wrong because if the US Intel community was 100% wrong on North Korea, then the same intel community was 10000% wrong on the state of Iran’s nuclear and missile capabilities (excuse the hyperbole).

Everyone knows that Iran financed North Korea’s nuclear and missile program with part of the $150 Billion dollars Obama gave to Iran.  So, not only did Obama’s intelligence corps spectacularly fail on its assessment, Obama gave Iran and North Korea the funds to finance the final push to their nuke and missile arsenals.

Which brings us to the post-January 2017 President Trump Tweet-trap intelligence operation.  President Trump, like any spy-master, looks for his asset’s greatest weakness.  In this case, President Trump concluded Kim Jong-Un’s greatest weakness was his personal vanity.  Once President Trump saw Kim’s “vanity-weakness,” he exploited it by tweeting personally nasty comments against the North Korean lunatic.  This predictably caused the North Korean leader to have to “prove” how strong and manly he really was.

US intelligence spent tens of billions of dollars and pays hundreds of “experts” to study North Korea’s nuclear and missile capability, and they got it catastrophically wrong.  Meanwhile, President Trump with nothing but his New York real estate smarts and his tweeter feed delivered the real intelligence of state of North Korea’s nuclear arsenal.

As an aside, what was President Trump supposed to tweet-back to Kim Jong-Un’s “nuclear button on the table” remark?  Anything President Trump tweeted would have been derided by the Trump-haters.  Trump is in a no-win hate-Trump-at-all-costs situation. Had he not tweeted back at all, the Left would have railed that President Trump was bested by his own tweeting game, and showed fatal weakness.

What the mainstream lemmings didn’t understand was they were actively interfering with President Trump’s ongoing intelligence operation.  And  Kim Jong-un gave away all of his military secrets, while President Trump gave away nothing.  President Trump doesn’t even have a “nuclear-button” on his desk.

In conclusion, can anyone imagine a Hillary Clinton administration where the US intelligence community and the US Congress are allowed to blunder along for another 4 or 8 years under the totally false belief that North Korea is still 4 years away from a miniaturized hydrogen bomb?

What horrifically wrong decisions would have been made believing that North Korea wasn’t really an immediate “clear and present danger”?

What equally bad decisions would have been taken about Iran if the world still believed North Korea was 6 years away from a deliverable nuclear-tipped ICBM?

The United States would have gotten hit with a surprise nuclear Pearl Harbor-type attack. Thanks to President Trump, now we know virtually exactly the true state of North Korea’s nuclear program.  President Trump should be lauded for his genius and his heroic intelligence coup that clearly exposed North Korea as an immediate and real nuclear-armed threat.

We all need to pray for President Trump’s health and success for the New Year.  President Trump’s safety and success is the safety and success of every freedom-loving person on this planet.

In 1912, imagine buying a super-expensive ticket on the unsinkable Titanic only to find out halfway across the Atlantic Ocean that not only is the Titanic sinking, but you are going to die drowning in the frigid waters.

It’s 2018 and that’s exactly how Russian President Vladimir Putin, and Foreign Minister Lavrov are feeling at this exact moment about their buy into Iranian debt and Iranian “hegemony.”  Iran’s genocidal Islamo-Fascist Regime is slowing or at the least, going up in flames.  The problem for Putin is that Putin has put all his Middle East eggs in the Shiite Ayatollah’s basket, and that basket has just crashed to the ground.

Let’s talk cash.  Putin has sold Iran and Syria weapons on credit, essentially based on the assumption of Iran’s solvency. Putin doesn’t have any money to begin with, so Putin has to borrow money and put the sovereign Russian accounts in debt to pay for the weapons he sells to Iran and Syria in return for Iranian and Syrian debt.  Not a  wise move.

As an example, soon after the Iran/Obama Nuke deal was signed, sealed and delivered by the US Congress in September 2015, RIA Novosti reported that the Russian sovereign government itself loaned Iran $5 billion, and the Russian infrastructure bank VEB loaned Iran another $2 Billion for a total of $7-8 Billion dollars.  Those numbers don’t even include the weapons and nuclear power plants Russia has “sold” to Syria and Iran on credit.  How do you say, “Iran is totally bankrupt and its IOUs are worthless” in Russian?

Next, Putin’s Russian weapons have co-partnered in the Iranian genocide of a half-million Sunni Arabs in Syria.  But, Putin has just realized that neither he nor Iran has the money to cement any form of an Assad Syrian post-war Pro-Russian regime.  As an Apollo 13 astronaut would have said in the situation, “Moscow, we have a problem.”  Iran blew through the 150 Billion dollars Obama gave them faster than a katyusha rocket.

Then, of course, Russia is now trying to shore up its Iranian tyrant friends by telling the United States “not to meddle.”  See this:  It’s ok for Russian jets to mass-murder Syrian opposition forces, but President Trump can’t tweet a little positive feedback to hundreds of thousands of Iranians who are sick and tired of their fanatical religious leaders who buy Russian death-machines instead of investing in Iran’s youth.  In Putin’s Orwellian world, Russian mass-murder of Syrians is not “meddling,” but President Trump’s tweeting to Iranian citizens is “meddling.”

And it gets even better.  Close to 20% of Russia is made up of vast territories comprised of Sunni Muslims.  The current Iranian revolution is lighting the fire under all those Sunni Muslims and encouraging them  to revolt against Putin – just as the Iranians are revolting against their brutal tyrannical ayatollahs.  The Sunni Russians would love to execute their own #MeToo campaign against Putin.

If Ayatollah Khamenei’s Regime is overthrown, Putin and Foreign Minister Lavrov will face an internal Islamic threat 50 times worse than that which NATO poses.  Add to this mix the fact that Russia’s Sunnis are upset that Putin backed the Shiite Iran genocide against the Syrian Sunnis so as to further enslave Sunni Islam.  Putin is sitting on a ticking internal Sunni Islamic nuclear bomb of his own making.

Putin may have thought he backed the Middle East “Strong Horse” in backing Iran.  But, with Iran’s streets in flames, it’s looking like Putin backed a paper tiger that  is about to go up in flames while turning his country into an economic cripple.

A little more than 8 years ago, during June 2009, the Iranian people who were peacefully protesting against the fraudulent Iranian Presidential election, were met with armed murderous Iranian Regime gangs who shot and murdered dozens of protesters.

Then, shockingly, President Obama sanctioned the Iranian Regime’s murderous repression by stating he didn’t want to be seen as “meddling” in Iran’s internal affairs. Among those unarmed peaceful protesters murdered by the motorcycle-mounted Iranian Regime Basij, or para-military militia, was Neda Agha-Soltan.

Today, whle this article is being read, there are dozens of massive spontaneous demonstrations of thousands of Iranians – raging throughout Iran. One wouldn’t know it because the media doesn’t want you to know that the brave Iranian people are reacting to President Trump’s explicit criticisms of the megalomaniacal and genocidal Iranian Theocratic Regime. Today’s protesting Iranians see in President Donald Trump a true liberator from the tyrannical and murderous Iranian Regime. All President Trump needs to do in 2017 to reverse Obama’s 2009 catastrophic sanction of Iranian murder is tweet “We remember Neda Agha-Soltan” and attach the following video of her bloody murder.

(Viewer discretion advised.)

or the shorter version:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8zFslcGmZnM

But, first, let’s learn a little about the Iranian martyr Neda Agha-Soltan. She was the 26 year-old child of an Iranian civil servant.  She had divorced her first husband in her early 20s because “his family’s social conservatism grated against Neda’s more liberal background, and the couple drifted apart” according to the Guardian.  It added, “Neda enjoyed new fashions and make-up, she went to the gym and loved dancing. She was fiercely independent and a voracious reader whose favourite novel was Emily Brontë’s Wuthering Heights.”

“…She was always very brave and defended herself,” says Rostami. “She was given the nickname Tayeb [after a 1970s South Tehran street tough]. All the children in the streets were afraid of Neda, because she was so strong. Even her older sister, Hoda, deferred to her.””

In short, Neda was beautiful free-spirited apolitical young Iranian with a mind of her own who just believed she should stand in a peaceful protest for her candidate Mousavi, who was seen as a little more moderate then the rigged Regime choice.

Tthen-President Obama’s clearly protected the Iranian regime.  While French President Sarkozy properly called the 2009 Iranian Presidential election a “fraud,” Obama took a mild, if not approving,, tone.  Neda was murdered on June 15, 2009.  The next day, on June 16, Obama spoke. We will let Obama’s despicable sanctioning of the Iranian Regime’s murders of peaceful protesters speak for themselves:

“It’s important to understand that, although there is amazing ferment taking place in Iran, the difference between Ahmadinejad and Mousavi in terms of their actual policies may not be as great as has been advertised.  Either way, we were going to be dealing with an Iranian regime that has historically been hostile to the United States, that has caused some problems in the neighborhood and has been pursuing nuclear weapons.  Am I optimistic that that will happen? You know – I take a wait-and-see approach. Either way, it’s important for the United States to engage in the tough diplomacy around those permanent security concerns that we have – nuclear weapons, funding of terrorism. It is not productive, given the history of US-Iranian relations to be seen as meddling – the US president, meddling in Iranian elections.”

That is how Obama gave the green light to the murderous Ayatollahs to murder at will.

Now, a little more than eight years later, the same murderous Iranian terror-state armed with the 150 billion dollars Obama gave it has spread bedlam and mayhem across the Middle East and endangered the world,with its evil-twin relationship with the North Korean nuclear maniac Kim Yong-Il.  Instead of investing the 150 billion in the people of Iran, the Iranian terror-state has planted seeds of terror, mass-murder, and genocide all over the world.

Iran will blithely murder hundreds of thousands of Muslims in Syria to achieve what it sees as its empire-making gateway to the Mediterranean Sea.

It’s the classic gambit for a terror-Nazi state, invest in guns to murder people rather than in butter to feed your own citizens.  And, without the Obama-safety-net, Iran’s guns-over-butter choice has come crashing down on the Iranian terror regime’s heads. Massive popular spontaneous protests have sprung up complaining about high-prices, shouting “Death to high-prices,” “Death to Rouhani,” Death to the Dictator.”  The “Dictator” is none other than Iran’s terrorist-in-chief “Supreme Leader” Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

And, while we are are on the subject of Iran’s Supreme Terrorist Khamenei, let’s take a look at a recent Khamenei tweet against America:

The war of tweets