Now that the Israeli elections are in full swing, everybody and his aunt are claiming they are “Centrists.”

You must be kidding! Yair Lapid a “centrist”? Lapid is a Two-Stater who will cede the entire ‘West Bank’ for a mere promise of a photo op with Obama. After the last Israeli elections, one of Lapid’s Yesh Atid Party’s MK’s, the American-turned-Israeli Orthodox Rabbi Dov Lipman, made the rounds in America. Lipman bragged to my group, “It was easy. We just followed the Democratic-American-pollster, Mark Mellman’s strict advice: Only talk about four focus-group-tested issues about the middle-class.”

Lapid and his party list were under strict orders from Democrat-Kerry-approved-pollster Mellman on how to hoodwink the entire Israeli public on the Israeli security issue simply by not talking about it. Lapid talks the talk of the “middle class”, but walks the walk of Two-State suicide solution. Mellman’s orders were: talk ‘middle-class,’ but don’t even mention the two-state solution, because it’ll lose votes.

Am I exaggerating? On Mark Mellman’s company website, Mellman posted an article by extreme leftist Chemi Shalev, an arch-left Haaretz piece extolling Mellman’s strategy as the “Secret of Lapid’s Success: Mark Mellman.” It’s easy to conclude that Mellman’s “success” was Israel’s catastrophic failure.

Mellman’s own words describe how Mellman played the Israeli public as utter idiots, as posted on Mellman’s own company website in order for Mellman’s Company to get more “customers” – and I’ve saved all the Mellman Groups’s web pages so don’t bother taking the article off your website:

“Mellman ascribes Lapid’s stunning success in last Tuesday’s Israeli election to the candidate’s personality and traits – and to the campaign’s decision to focus, almost exclusively, on the single message of looking out for the interests of the middle class.

“One of the key lessons of campaigning,” he [Mellman] says, “is that you have to focus, and that was our focus. Talking about other issues tended to dilute that focus. Talking about the Palestinians and the peace process may not have been detrimental, but it wasn’t helpful either. And when you’re starting from scratch, you have to gain votes, not just not lose them.” (I only added “[Mellman]” for clarity.)

In Mellman’s words, Lapid’s “Talking about the Palestinians and the peace process . . . wasn’t helpful either.” So, Mellman’s advice to Lapid and his coterie: Under penalty of electoral-death, don’t talk about the most central issue to Israelis, that Yair Lapid will support the creation of a Palestinian terrorist State that will fire Sarin-tipped katyusha rockets into Tel Aviv, just talk about the ‘middle class.’

If Likud doesn’t expose Lapid as a leftist now, be assured that Lapid’s American handler will successfully repeat his “bait and switch” on the Israeli public, and steal the moderate vote once again.

The recent Israeli daylight strike at the heart of the Iranian Shi’ite project has shown the Iranian-Hezbollah behemoth to be a paper tiger incapable of ultimately defeating the Moderate Sunni-Israeli alliance that is congealing against its hegemonic imperial ambitions.

In February 2013, Mehdi Taeb, a high-level Iranian cleric, speaking to Iran’s Basij (paramilitary group attached to the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps), said “Syria is…[Iran’s] 35th province and a strategic province for us. If the enemy attacks us and wants to take either Syria or Khuzestan, the priority for us is to keep Syria…If we keep Syria, we can get Khuzestan back too, but if we lose Syria, we cannot keep Tehran.”

What was Taeb saying?  Taeb meant that if Iran loses Arabic-Syria, Iran’s “35th Province”, nothing will stop the Arabs from cascading eastward and taking the Iranian Arab-majority Khuzestan Province.  Khuzestan holds 90% of Iran’s oil reserves, and is situated, defenseless, west of the Zagros Mountains that form Iran’s western border.  And, without the oil-rich Khuzestan, Iran is nothing but a bankrupt, oil-poor, Bangladesh of an Islamic country.

Fantasy? Aisha Noor in the leading Pakistani daily, The Nation, just wrote in an op-ed:

“The twin crises in Syria and Egypt have marked the emergence of a new superpower coalition in the Middle East, the odd couple alliance of Israel and Saudi Arabia, with Jordan serving as an intermediary and the Persian Gulf oil sheikdoms playing a supporting role.”

By striking Iran’s weakest link, Assad, Israel has brought joy to the hundreds of millions of Sunnis who rightly see the Persian Iranians as their true arch-enemy, not Israel.  And, even better, Iran is impotent to lift so much as a single Hezbollah finger against Israel in retaliation. Consequently, the Israeli raid has given millions of Arab Sunnis hope that Iran’s Shi’ite enclaves, otherwise called “Syria” and “Iraq” will soon be broken, and all the Arabs will come east for their rightful inheritance, the oil-rich Arab region of Khuzestan, the Arabic-speaking Iranian Province which the Persian have stolen and raped it of all its Arab-petrodollars.

In this Arab Shi’ite-Sunni War, what is the Persian Iranians’ big-picture strategy?  Do the Arab Sunnis really want to behead Arab Shi’ites, and vice versa?  Some  do, but most don’t.  Shi’ite-colonizing Persian Iranians have purposefully instigated an Arab Sunni-Shi’ite sectarian holocaust.  The Persian Iranian goal is not for all “the Shi’ites” to win, but for all the Arabs, all the Sunnis and Shi’ites alike, to kill one another and be so divided that the Arabs will have no energy left when the Persian Iranians come in for the kill, and take the entire Arab “Persian” Gulf containing 56% of the worlds oil supply.

This war isn’t a Shia-Sunni War; this is a Persian-Arab War.  But, unfortunately, the Arabs are being played for fools by their Persian Iranian puppeteers.

Hence, Israel’s attack on the Damascus Airport arms depot will, in years to come, be seen as nothing less than a modern-day attack of the Bastille by the French Revolutionaries.  By attacking Damascus, Israel has signaled it stands with the moderate Sunni Arabs, and with all Arabs including Shi’ites, against the Shi’ite colonializing tyranny of the Persian Iranians.

Israel bravely rejected Obama’s mollycoddling, de facto protection, of Assad, Iran’s puppet, and showed itself to be the functional heart of an Israeli-moderate Pan-Arab alliance.  And, with time, this Israeli-Moderate Arab alliance will come to vanquish Iran’s modern-day Shi’ite colonization of the Arab world, and of the earlier Safavid Empire’s Shi’ite colonization of Iran itself.

In other words, what really happened is that the Israeli strike has shown the Hezbollah-Iranian behemoth to be nothing more than a paper tiger incapable of responding to a daylight Israeli raid on the heart of their 35th Province.

Israel doesn’t need to attack Iran with 1000’s of miles or hundreds of F-16s traveling to destroy the Persian Iranians nuclear bomb plants.  All Israel needs to do is to allow the South Syrian Moderate Sunni rebels to congeal and to start a pan-Arabic avalanche which will sweep eastward, and demolish the Persian Iranians neo-Safavidic Empire.